I have lived with Type 1 diabetes for 23 years. During the first several years after my diagnosis, I managed it well, but for nearly a decade afterward, I struggled significantly with both the disease and the emotional toll it carried. At times, I genuinely believed I would not survive it. Despite those challenges, I remained proactive about my health and consistently attended annual eye exams.
In 2025, during an appointment at this clinic, a physician informed me that I had developed a cataract. The news was emotionally overwhelming, and I became visibly upset during the visit. The physician later stated he was unsure whether the cataract was related to diabetes and mentioned that I likely would not need to worry about it for another 10–20 years.
During a follow-up appointment this year with a different provider, I was informed that she did not see the retinal bleeding previously documented, nor did she observe signs of retinopathy. This was the first time I became aware that retinal bleeding had apparently been noted in my prior exam findings. I was disappointed and concerned that this information was never clearly communicated to me at the time.
As a patient, I believe transparent communication is essential, especially regarding findings that may impact long-term health. Due to this experience and the conflicting information provided, I no longer feel confident continuing my care at this clinic and will be seeking treatment elsewhere with a provider who communicates thoroughly and collaboratively.
